La Grenade v. Gordon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
The sole question presented for review is whether plaintiff’s complaint states a claim for which relief can be granted. We answer, “Yes.”
The father of a minor child is its natural guardian, at common law, and his right of control over the child is superior to that of the mother, in the absence'of a court’s contrary determination of custody. Tyner v. Tyner, 206 N.C. 776, 175 S.E. 144 (1934); Patrick v. Bryan, 202 N.C. 62, 162 S.E. 207 (1932). Thus, a father has a right of action against every person who knowingly and wittingly interrupts the relation subsisting between himself and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Patrick Ex Rel. Michal v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Tyner v. TynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Howell v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Silcott v. OglesbyTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- D & D Fuller CATV Construction, Inc. v. PaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Marshak v. MarshakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.