Legal Opinion

La Grenade v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1980No. 7921SC903PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

The sole question presented for review is whether plaintiff’s complaint states a claim for which relief can be granted. We answer, “Yes.”

The father of a minor child is its natural guardian, at common law, and his right of control over the child is superior to that of the mother, in the absence'of a court’s contrary determination of custody. Tyner v. Tyner, 206 N.C. 776, 175 S.E. 144 (1934); Patrick v. Bryan, 202 N.C. 62, 162 S.E. 207 (1932). Thus, a father has a right of action against every person who knowingly and wittingly interrupts the relation subsisting between himself and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Patrick Ex Rel. Michal v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Tyner v. TynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Howell v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Silcott v. OglesbyTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. D & D Fuller CATV Construction, Inc. v. PaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Marshak v. MarshakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API