Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The policy in suit purports to be a “paid up” policy in lieu of policy No. 39,135, issued Sept. 24, 1869. The contract set forth in the policy is, that in consideration of 1480.25 paid, and of the annual payment of interest on four notes on or before the eleventh day of November in every year during the continuance of the policy, the company insure the life of James O. Eddy in the amount of $500, which the company agree to pay according to the terms of the policy, “ any indebtedness to the company on account of this policy being first deducted therefrom.” The policy contains the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franklin Life Insurance v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Montgomery v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  3. St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  4. Home Life Insurance v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Hull v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General American Life Insurance v. ButtsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Owen v. New York Life Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Jones v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Kaeppel v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  5. Commonwealth Life Insurance v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API