Kiessig v. Allspaugh
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover $1,807.25 upon a building contractors’ bond executed to him by the defendants Allspaugh and Hall as principals, and by the defendant Lundeen as surety. The bond sued upon was executed on October 15, 1887, and after reciting the fact that . the principals therein had upon October 14, 1887, entered into *453a contract with the plaintiff here to build for him a certain house, for the price and in accordance with the specifications contained in said contract, proceeds; “Now, therefore, we, A; M. Allspaugh and M. S. Hall, as principals, and H. V. Poser and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kiessig v. AllspaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by12 opinions
- People's Lumber Co. v. GillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McMenomy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Phelps v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Carpenter v. FurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hub Hardware Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liab. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.