Legal Opinion

Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. Neal

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1891No. 14103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

— This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against defendant Neal, owner of the building, and one Goetzman, the contractor.

Defendant Neal appeals from the judgment and order denying her motion for a new trial.

The contract between the defendant Neal and Goetzman, the contractor, under which Goetzman began the erection of the building, was declared void by the court, owing to the failure of recordation, and other defects. Attached to this contract was a bond in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, signed by the contractor, Goetzman, as principal, and the Schallert Ganahl Lumber…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMenomy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kiessig v. AllspaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API