Legal Opinion

Jason Shade, Individually v. City of Farmington, Minnesota, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation Ted Dau, Individually and in His Official Capacity

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2002No. 01-2487PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Jason Shade (Shade) brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging that his constitutional right to be free from an unreasonable search and seizure was violated by school officials and police officers. He also sought attorneys fees and costs for alleged violations of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Data Practices Act), Minn.Stat. §§ 13.01-13.99. The district court2 ruled on summary judgment that police officer Ted Dau was entitled to qualified immunity for his role in the search and that Shade was not entitled to attorney’s fees and costs under the Data…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Porter v. Ascension Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Vassallo Ex Rel. K v. v. LandoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. C.N. Ex Rel. J.N. v. Willmar Public Schools, Independent School District No. 347Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Richmond v. City of Brooklyn CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API