Legal Opinion
Keating v. Stadium Management Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 2, 1987PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The essential facts are not in dispute; the admissibility of evidence establishing them and their relevance are contested. From 1971 to 1973 the plaintiff had been employed as director of operations at Schaefer (now Sullivan) Stadium in Foxborough, a facility leased and operated by Stadium Realty Trust (Trust), the predecessor of the defendant. From 1975 to 1978, the plaintiff was likewise employed at the Meadowlands, a New Jersey complex then consisting of a stadium and a horse racing track. His responsibilities there included the procurement of commercial advertising within the stadium and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Merrimack Valley National Bank v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Rizzo v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Bank v. Thermo Elemental Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Lanier Professional Services, Inc. v. RicciCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.