Legal Opinion
Yancey v. Floyd West & Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 28, 1988No. 2-87-263-CVPublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATTIMORE, Justice.
Appellant, plaintiff below, brought suit against appellees seeking damages for: alleged failure to provide a defense against intervenor, Midway Camp, pursuant to an insurance contract; violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act; and viola tions of article 21.21 of the Insurance Code. Appellees requested, and the trial court granted, summary judgment contending appellant was not covered by any of the applicable policies for the claim at issue.
Appellant brings three points of error alleging error in granting summary judgment.
We affirm.
Due to the complexity…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Canutillo Independent School District v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- State Farm Lloyds v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Johnson v. Structured Asset Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.