Legal Opinion

State v. Fuhr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1983No. WD 34603PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for capital murder. A life sentence without probation or parole for fifty years was imposed. We affirm the judgment.

Defendant raises two issues on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to declare a mistrial because of claimed error in the prosecutor’s closing argument and (2) that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay evidence and thus violated defendant’s right to confrontation.

The defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, but the following statement of the facts adduced at trial is necessary for a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. State v. NewlonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State v. CuckovichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. CornmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. State v. NewboldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Trimble v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API