Legal Opinion

Knudsen v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1964No. Civ. 10835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

In this action by plaintiff Knudsen for the conversion by defendants Hill of a pledged promissory note belonging to plaintiff then having a face value of $24,674.20, judgment was for plaintiff, but the court fixed the value of the converted note at $16,052.26.

Knudsen appeals, his sole contention being that the court should have allowed the full face value of the converted note. We sustain this contention, holding that damages for the conversion of a secured promissory note where there is no personal liability for deficiency judgment on the part of the maker are properly measured by the value…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Meyer v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. MacKen v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Wong v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Wylde v. SchoeningWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. FrisoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Salem Development Co. v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. American Master Lease v. Idanta PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API