Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1936No. Civ. 10163PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J., pro tem.

This appeal arises out of certain transactions with regard to a promissory note and deed of trust. The action was tried by the court sitting with a jury in an advisory capacity. The court made findings and entered judgment in the sum of $4,444.12 in plaintiff’s favor and against defendants Thomas and DeBold, from which judgment said defendants appeal, upon the judgment roll alone.

The facts as found by the court are as follows: Anna Marie Meyer died intestate, leaving as heirs two sons, the defendant Herbert F. Meyer and the plaintiff Stanley H. Meyer. Prior to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Beatty v. Pacific States Savings and Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Passanisi v. Merit-McBride Realtors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Phillips v. Utah State Credit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Axe v. Commercial Credit Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API