L.T.M. Builders Co. v. Village of Jefferson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.
In their first two propositions of law appellants challenge the trial court’s refusal to make separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellants contend that the court’s refusal to make such findings constitutes reversible error.
Pursuant to Civ. R. 53(E)(2), a party may file written objections to a referee’s report. Under this rule the court may, upon consideration of the objections, “adopt, reject or modify the report.”1 Appellants herein filed 11 pages of objections to the referee’s report, including the following:
“8. With respect to Findings No. 4, 5, 7 and 11 of the Referee’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- F. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Millies v. MilliesOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- American Guaranty Co. v. Cliff Wood Coal & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Shore v. ChesterOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hansel v. Creative Concrete & Masonry Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- William Cherry Trust v. HofmannOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hines v. AmoleOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Liebe v. Admin., Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- 3910 Warrensville Center, Inc. v. City of Warrensville HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984