Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Romy Hammes Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1959No. 37567, 37568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The plaintiff’s petition contained the following prayer for process and service: “Wherefore, petitioner prays that process issue and that defendants be required to answer at next term of this court, and that petitioner have judgment with costs.” The original process attached to the petition by the clerk of the superior court, in accordance with the act of 1946 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 761, 768; Code, Ann., § 81-201), required the defendants to answer within 30 days. All the defendants filed motions to quash such process which were sustained by the trial court who thereafter ordered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Long Cigar & Grocery Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Banister v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Nalley Land & Investment Co. v. Merchants & Planters BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Dasher v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Malcom v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WillsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Hunt v. DenbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Burrow v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. McCoy v. Cy Owens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Douglas Motor Sales, Inc. v. Romy Hammes Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API