Legal Opinion

Banister v. Hubbard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 1950No. 33277PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. Did the superior court judge have the power and authority on his own motion to pass the order to which ex ception is made? Code § 24-104(6) provides that a court of this State has the power “To amend and control its processes and orders, so as to make them conformable to law and justice; and to amend its own records, so as to make them conform to the truth.” Code § 24-104(4) provides that courts have the power “To control, in furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers and all other persons connected with a judicial proceeding-before it, in every matter appertaining thereto.” It…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Goodrum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Neal-Millard Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Nicholas v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Crudup v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Wheeless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Parr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Scocca v. WiltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API