Legal Opinion

Head & Dowst Co. v. New England Breeders' Club

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit, to enforce a builder’s lien. Trial by the court and verdict for the plaintiffs. Transferred from the September term, 1907, of the superior court by Peaslee, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBingham, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought to enforce a builder’s lien, under sections 10, 16, and 17, chapter 141, of the Public Statutes, for labor performed and materials furnished in the construction of certain buildings and appurtenances. In the superior court a general verdict was found for the plaintiffs, and a judgment in rem was ordered against all the land described in a certain deed to the defendants, including the buildings and appurtenances constructed thereon by the plaintiffs. The verdict being general, it is to be assumed that the trial court found that the plaintiffs performed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  2. Farnham v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  3. Coles v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  4. Noyes v. PatrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  5. Tilton v. TiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Slip Scarf Co. v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  3. Moynihan v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  4. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  5. Freeman v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API