Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Pacific Mills

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 26, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

The plaintiff claims that the exceptions filed in the superior court, there allowed and upon which the case was transferred to this court, are not available to the defendant. This is a proceeding in equity P. L., c. 178, s. 25. The exceptions relate mainly to alleged errors in applying the law to facts found. Of course such exceptions can only be taken after the court has disclosed the mental processes by which conclusions have been reached. Decisions relating to objections and exceptions which could and should be presented during the trial have no application.

But it is said that as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Doody v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Manchester Amusement Co. v. Conn.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  4. Moynihan v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  5. Head & Dowst Co. v. New England Breeders' ClubSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. CiborowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Gagne v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Simes v. AtwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API