Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 1993No. Civ. A. 89-142 (CRR)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are the Defendants’ and the Plaintiffs’ responses to this Court’s Order of April 6, 1993, where this Court ordered the Defendants to show cause as to whether they should be held in civil contempt for their failure to comply with this Court’s Orders of January 6 and 11, 1993. The Court held a hearing on this matter on May 17, 1993.
After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, the arguments of counsel, the record in the case and the underlying law, the Court finds that the Defendants are in contempt of this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scott Armstrong v. George BushCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Armstrong v. Executive Office of the PresidentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Scott Armstrong, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Executive Office of the President, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- In Re: Sealed Case No. 99-3091(office of Independent Counsel Contempt Proceeding)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- In Re: David A. Kessler, M.D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.