Ditmars-31' Street Development Corp. v. Punia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Rabin, J.
The agreed statement of facts submitted On this controversy (Civ. Frac. Act, §§ 546-548) presents, as between purchaser and seller, an issue of law as to the construction of a written contract between them for the sale of real property. The amount of the purchase price required to be paid by the purchaser on the title closing and the consequent ownership of the escrow fund in suit depend upon the determination of such issue.
The facts, as set forth in the submission, are substantially as follows:
On January 26, i960, defendants Punía and Marx, copartners doing business as Limax Company, as the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Raleigh Associates, Inc. v. HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Clark v. DalesNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Homer v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Refinemet International Co. v. Eastbourne N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Philadelphia Savings Fund Society v. Deseret Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Romero v. Cotton Butane Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Clayton v. Communications Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Foremost Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.