Legal Opinion
Refinemet International Co. v. Eastbourne N.V.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1993No. 88 Civ. 8527 (JES)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Refinemet International Company (“Refinemet” or “plaintiff’) brings this action for damages against Eastbourne N.V. (“Eastbourne” or “defendant”) for breach of an indemnification agreement, and for a declaration of Eastbourne’s future liability for continuing reimbursement of expenses paid or incurred by Refinemet. The Court having held a bench trial, having seen and heard the witnesses, having reviewed in detail the exhibits proffered by the parties, finds in favor of the defendant. Accordingly, for the reasons that follow, judgment shall be entered…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. And Yellowbill Finance Limited v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- ESPN, Inc. v. Office of the Commissioner of BaseballDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Elda Arnhold and Byzantio, L.L.C. v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- F.C. Cycles International, Inc. v. Fila Sport, S.p.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Refinemet International Company v. Eastbourne N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- General Motors Corp. v. New A.C. Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.