Taylor v. Ford
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and- from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This action was brought under section 1050 of the Code of Civil Procedure, tcv have determined an adverse claim which defendant asserted against plaintiff upon a certain promissory note for $8,509.85. Defendant filed a pleading styled “ an answer and cross-complaint,” which was in form and substance a complaint upon said promissory note, with a prayer for judgment against plaintiff for the amount due thereon. Plaintiff answered, setting up want of consideration and other defenses. At the proper time, plaintiff demanded a jury. The court denied this demand, and proceeded to try the case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shields v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Kenny v. McKenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Gillespie v. GoulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Burleigh v. HechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- In re FoleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.