Legal Opinion

Barthell v. Zachman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Complainants are members of Nashville Aerie Number 86, a subordinate lodge of the Fraternal Order of Eagles. The defendants Zachman and Dillingham are representatives of the Grand Aerie appointed by the Grand President under Article X, section 1, to investigate complaint of irregularities in the subordinate lodge. Defendants Duncan, Little and Simian are members of the Grand Aerie appointed by the Grand President under Article LIII, section 17, of the Constitution, to sit as a trial commission and hear charges of misconduct preferred against members of the local Aerie. Defendant Hayes was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Sanford and TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Baker v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Mengle Box Co. v. Lauderdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Honea v. American CouncilTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Vaughn v. HerndonTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Wilson v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Rule v. Brotherhood's Relief & Compensation FundCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. International Harvester Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API