Legal Opinion

E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1978No. 77-27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 79 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4705, 432 F. Supp. 1354 (1977), which dismissed an action challenging the classification of certain imported merchandise as “Tooth brushes” under item 750.40, TSUS, and claiming classification as “Electrical articles and electrical parts of articles, not specifically provided for” under item 688.40, TSUS, or alternatively as “Machines not specially provided for, and parts thereof” under item 678.50; TSUS. We affirm.

The merchandise was denominated on the commercial and special customs invoices…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Jack Schaefer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API