Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Oxford Immunotec Ltd. v. Qiagen, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 26, 2017No. Civil Action No. 15-13124-NMGPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, J.

Plaintiff Oxford Immunotec Ltd. (“plaintiff’ or “Oxford”) alleges defendants Qia-gen, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (“defendants” or “Qiagen”) infringed its patents relating to a method and kit for diagnosing tuberculosis. Oxford seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin Qiagen from selling the QFT-Plus one-tube option to new customers currently using a tuberculin skin test or TSPOT.TB.

I. Background

A. Overview of the Patented Technology

Oxford owns six patents describing a method and kit for diagnosing tuberculosis in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Kerrissey v. Commercial Credit Grp., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  3. Doe v. PikeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  4. Kerrissey v. Commercial Credit Group Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  5. Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API