Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, Rea, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDioeinson, J.

This action being tried before a jury, the court dismissed it, upon motion, upon the case as presented by the plaintiff. Upon this appeal it is to be considered whether the plaintiff had made proof of facts sufficient to justify a recovery for fraud. The evidence on the part of the plaintiff tended to show a state of facts which may be briefly stated as follows: In the course of negotiations between these parties respecting the purchase of certain land by the plaintiff, the defendant stated that, while the legal title was in one Woodman, he (defendant) had an arrangement which enabled him to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Gannon, Goulding & Thies v. HausamanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Carlton v. HulettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Stacey v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Thompson v. NickleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API