Gannon, Goulding & Thies v. Hausaman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Garfield County; Winfield Scott, Judge. Action by Effie D. Hausaman against Gannon, Goulding & Thies. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
The defendant in error sued the plaintiffs in error in the county court for damages alleged to have occurred because of fraud and deceit and false and fraudulent statements made by defendants in regard to a land trade. After alleging that defendants, Gannon, Goulding & Thies, compose a partnership, engaged in the real estate, loan, and abstract business, and that in such capacity they negotiated with her the terms of a trade by which she exchanged certain lands for city real estate, she avers :
“That plaintiff thereupon, and by and through her duly authorized agent, R. J.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Riley v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Garvin v. HarrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Bristol v. BraidwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nash Mississippi Valley Motor Co. v. ChildressMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Leasure v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Cooper v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Goody Ex Rel. Goody v. Maryland Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.