Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1890PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Hooker, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $2,169.33 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins-, J.

This case appears for a second time in this court, it having been heretofore reported in 39 Minn. 24, (38 N. W. Rep. 686,) where it was held that plaintiff might recover, as for fraud, upon evidence going to show false representations by defendant, made as of his own knowledge, respecting the title to real estate, to plaintiff, who, being ignorant of the facts, purchased relying upon the representations. From the testimony in the case as certified up, it appears that, while this transaction is not the one considered in an action between these same parties, (41 Minn. 279, 43 N. W. Rep. 53,) it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Morris v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Reynolds v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Reynolds v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Woolenslagle v. RunalsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  4. Rockefeller v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API