Legal Opinion

Timolat v. Philadelphia Pneumatic Tool Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 30, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 369,120, for a portable drilling machine, granted to John Moffet August 30, 1887. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity to recover damages for infringement of United States letters patent issued to John Moffet, No. 369,120, granted August 30, 1887, and to restrain infringement of claims 1 and 2 of said patent, of which complainant Timolat is the assignee, and the complainant corporation sole licensee. The patent is for a portable drilling machine. Its motive power is a rotary engine operated by steam or compressed air, compactly united and inclosed in a light cylindrical case, adapted to be used by the hand of the operator. The specification calling attention to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Philadelphia Pneumatic Tool Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  4. New Departure Bell Co. v. Bevin Bros. Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  5. Timolat v. Franklin Boiler Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Envelope Sealer Mfg. Co. v. Graywood Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922
  2. In re ReevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. Old Colony Bondholders v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Old Colony Bondholders v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API