Legal Opinion · Dissent

Old Colony Bondholders v. New York, N. H. & H. R.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 13, 1947No. 200 and 89, Docket 20048Published

1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge

My dissent relates solely to my colleagues’ opinion concerning the method of fixing the price of the Old Colony property, as to which I disagree on two alternative grounds.

I

The Plan, as to Old Colony, is based on a “sale ***<?/ the property.” Such a Plan is governed by § 77, sub. b(5), which requires the fixing of a “fair upset price.”

Briefly stated, my first ground is as follows : Under § 77, sub. a, the Commission could have formulated a Plan for the reorganization of Old Colony either (1) “in connection with” or (2) “as a part of the reorganization” of the New Haven. For reasons I shall…

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API