New Departure Bell Co. v. Bevin Bros. Manuf'g Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
This is an appeal from a final decree of the circuit court for the district of Connecticut on pleadings and proofs, sustaining the validity of letters patent No. 471,982, enjoining defendant from infringing., the same, and directing the payment by defendant of $175 -as profits and damages by reason of acts of infringement by it committed. 64 Fed. 859.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The bill of complaint charged infringement of three patents, all granted to E. D. Rockwell, assignor to complainant, as follows: No. 456,062, July 14, 1891; No. 471,-982, March 29, 1892; No. 471,983, March 29, 1892; the first two relating to improvements in bicycle bells; the third intended for and •adapted to stationary bells used on doors. The circuit court sustained the validity of all three patents, but held that defendant had not infringed either No. 456,062 or No. 471,983; and from this decision complainant has not appealed. The only questions; therefore, coming…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Sirocco Engineering Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Universal Winding Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1897
- Pennington v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Dodge Coal Storage Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Jones v. CyphersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.