Cox v. Independent Life & Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
The sole issue in this case is whether there is any evidence to support the finding of the jury that the death of the insured was caused by accident rather than suicide. In so far as drunkenness bears on this problem, the rule is as follows: “An accident, even though it be the result of that loss of perception produced by drink, cannot fairly be called the product of intent. But if the intent in fact exists, the other fact, •that the man was maudlin from drink, and could have no very intelligent conception of his surroundings, does not help the case; since the drunkenness is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. PatersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1870
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Gem City Life Insurance v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Schneider v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The KROGER COMPANY v. PerpallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- WINN DIXIE STORES, INC. v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Edgeman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Taylor v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.