Legal Opinion
The KROGER COMPANY v. Perpall
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 3, 1962No. 39381PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
The allegations of the petition that the defendant through its driver was negligent in failing to provide blocks to prevent the tractor-trailer unit from rolling forward after it had been parked is attacked by special demurrers 1 and 24 on the grounds that the petition fails to plead facts showing any necessity for providing blocks' to. prevent the unit from rolling forward or to allege that the driver either failed to apply parking brakes or knew that the parking brakes would be insufficient. The petition does allege that the brakes were inadequate to hold the vehicle, that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Pantone v. PantoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Carusos v. Briarcliff Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Douglas v. PrescottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Molly Pitcher Canning Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Douglas v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Cagle v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Getz Services, Inc. v. PerloeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Fouts v. Builders Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.