Legal Opinion
State v. Steimel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 2007No. 2006-115PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The State appeals the Trial Court’s (Hampsey, J.) grant of motions to suppress evidence filed by the defendant, Jonathan Steimel. The State argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the defendant was in custody when he confessed, and that no exigent circumstances justified takihg the defendant’s blood without a warrant. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were either found by the trial court or appear in the record. The defendant was involved in a head-on collision around 10:00 p.m. on the Sunday before Labor Day, 2004, on Route 13 in Milford. When Officer William Bright of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State of New Hampshire v. Timothy McKennaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- George Stergiou & a. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.