Legal Opinion

Davis v. Tower Bldg. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 23, 1937No. Nos. 5901, 5995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Shortly after the passage in 1934 of the amendment to the Bankruptcy Act known as section 77B (11 U.S.C.A. § 207), a proceeding for reorganization was filed in the District Court. That matter has progressed to a decree confirming a plan for reorganization. In the course of the proceedings, appellants, constituting a bondholders’ committee, filed their petition for allowance for compensation and expenses under subsection (c), paragraph (9), 11 U.S.C.A. § 207 (c) (9), which reads, in part, as follows: “The judge * * * (9) may allow a reasonable compensation for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Compton v. National Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sullivan & Cromwell v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. Milbank, Tweed & Hope v. McCueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  3. Silver v. Scullin Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. Abrams v. ScandrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API