Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 8782PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to require the respondent superior court to assume jurisdiction over a minor child found to be a resident of Alameda County. The respondent county is joined as a party, but as no cause of action is stated against it, the demurrer of the county is sustained.
From the stipulation of facts it appears that Margarita Altamirano was born December 13,1917, in Alameda County, the illegitimate child of Anna Castro; that the father of said child is unknown; that Anna Castro has at all times resided in Alameda County; that, shortly after the birth of the child,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Temple v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Board of Supervisors v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Warren County, Mississippi v. HesterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- United States v. Nebo Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.