Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Elmer N. Waleen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1933No. 29,453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 250 N.W. 798. The charges filed against the respondent were referred to the Honorable James C. Michael, judge of the second judicial district, to take evidence and make findings of fact. The complaint contains seven counts, two of which were abandoned at the hearing. The findings regarding respondent's misconduct were based upon his own testimony and upon that of other witnesses with whom respondent dealt. The five remaining charges upon which findings have been made will here be discussed in as much detail as is necessary for an understanding of the questions involved.

Respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. In re Removal of CarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. In Re Disbarment of L. John MoerkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. In Re Disbarment of Myron L. SkinnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. In Re Disbarment of Olander J. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. In Re HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State ex rel. Hunter v. MarconnitNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In Re Disbarment of Elmer N. WaleenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API