Legal Opinion
In Re Wenz
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 2004No. 02-146PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
¶1 On April 22, 2003, the Montana Supreme Court Commission on Practice (the Commission) filed its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation regarding the Complaint filed against Respondent Warren C. Wenz (Wenz). The Commission concluded that Wenz violated Rule 1.10 of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct (M.R.P.C.), when he and his firm undertook dual representation of two *202clients who were directly adverse and Wenz failed to make appropriate inquiries about the clients’ consent to the dual representation. The Commission unanimously recommended that Wenz be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coalition for Canyon Preservation v. Karl S. Bowers, Administrator, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Grievance Committee v. RottnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Goldstein v. Commission on Practice of the Supreme CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Krutzfeldt Ranch, LLC v. Pinnacle BankMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. ArmijoWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- In re PottsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re WenzMontana Supreme Court · 2004