Legal Opinion

In Re Wenz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2004No. 02-146Published

1Opinion of the Court

87 P.3d 376 (2004)

2004 MT 7

In the Matter of Warren C. WENZ, an Attorney at Law, Respondent.

No. 02-146.

Supreme Court of Montana.

January 26, 2004.

OPINION & ORDER

ś 1 On April 22, 2003, the Montana Supreme Court Commission on Practice (the Commission) filed its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation regarding the Complaint filed against Respondent Warren C. Wenz (Wenz). The Commission concluded that Wenz violated Rule 1.10 of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct (M.R.P.C.), when he and his firm undertook dual representation of two clients who were directly adverse and Wenz…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coalition for Canyon Preservation v. Karl S. Bowers, Administrator, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Grievance Committee v. RottnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Goldstein v. Commission on Practice of the Supreme CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API