Legal Opinion
In re Potts
Montana Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 2007No. 04-562PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
¶1 Respondent Steven T. Potts (Potts), an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Montana, objects to the Statement of Costs filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) on May 29, 2007, stemming from the disciplinary proceeding against Potts before the Commission on Practice of the Supreme Court of the State of Montana (the Commission). Potts also requests a hearing before an Adjudicatory Panel pursuant to Rule 9A(8), Montana Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (MRLDE), and this Court’s decision in In re Potts, 2007 MT 81, 336 Mont. 517, 158 P.3d 418. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Delaware v. K-Decorators, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
- Scott v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Goldstein v. Commission on Practice of the Supreme CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Muri v. FrankMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re PottsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re BestMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re EngelMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Plains Grains Ltd. Partnership v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Plains Grains Ltd. Partnership v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2010