Legal Opinion

Alaska United Gold Min. Co. v. Keating

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1902No. 742PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge

*836The defendant in error has interposed a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the grounds that no petition for the writ of error was filed herein in accordance with rule 11 of this court (31 C.C.A. cxlvi, 90 Fed. cxlvi), and no writ of error was allowed by any judge, as required by said rules and the rules prescribed by the supreme court of the United States. The motion was made upon the further ground that the writ of error was not under the seal of the court from which it was issued, and did not bear teste from the date of its issue.

Rule 11 of this court prescribes the practice to be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Davidson v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Brown v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Brandies v. CochraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Daniel E. Moore v. Frank T. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Winters v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Chula v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Caracci v. Brother International Sewing MacHine Corp. of LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
  5. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API