Legal Opinion

Guy v. . Gould

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover the balance due on the rent for the unexpired term of a lease executed by the plaintiff to the defendants, C. A. Gould, Marcus R. Field and Francis E. Field, for a lot of land situate in the village of Biltmore, N.C.

The lease is dated 13 August, 1923, and was for a term of eight years from its date. The rent at the rate of $250 per month was paid to 13 August, 1928. The defendants have failed to pay the rent which has accrued since said date. The amount now due is $9,000, less the sum of $40.00, which was collected by plaintiff as rent for the lot of land, after…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Litaker v. Bost Ex Rel. BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Strum v. Greenville Timberline, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Nicholson v. DeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Widenhouse v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API