Legal Opinion

Widenhouse v. Yow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1963No. 532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Each defendant assigns as error the denial of his motions for judgment of nonsuit.

There was ample evidence to support a finding that, as alleged by plaintiffs, (1) the negligent operation of the Ford by Helms proximately caused the collision and (2) defendant Yow as owner-occupant of the Ford was liable for damages caused by the actionable negligence of Helms. Helms contends the evidence offered by plaintiffs and admitted over his objections tending to show Helms was the operator of the Ford was incompetent and should have been excluded. However, admitted evidence, whether competent or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Murray v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Gunter v. WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belmany v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Lester Brothers, Inc. v. JM THOMPSON COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Nicholson v. DeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Herring v. McClainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API