Strum v. Greenville Timberline, LLC
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial or to alter or amend the verdict where the jury’s failure to follow the court’s instructions did not render the verdict improper, and where there was competent evidence to support the verdict.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff Melvin Charles “Chuck” Strum (“Strum”) is a realtor associated with ReMax in the Mountains (“ReMax”), a real estate company in western North Carolina owned by plaintiffs Marty and Vickie Kinsey. On 4 December 2002, Strum and ReMax entered into a Buyer Agency Agreement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Will of BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Anderson v. HollifieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Palmer v. . JennetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Guy v. . GouldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kor Xiong v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Ward v. CarmonaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Chisum v. CampagnaNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019
- Denver Prop. Partners, LLC v. SissonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
- Kor Xiong v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.