Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hodgdon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

On November 30,1942, Hodgdon purchased from Hall through the latter’s agent a certain tractor. At the time of the sale and in connection therewith, Hodgdon received a paper entitled “Order for Machines” which set forth a warranty or warranties in respect to the tractor. The machine did not function properly and Hodgdon by writ dated August 2, 1943, brought a suit at law against Hall. In this law action Hodgdon demanded a refund of the purchase price or damages for breach of warranty. Hall then brought a suit in equity claiming that the above noted paper was given and received under a mutual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Russell & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fred W. Wolf Co. v. Monarch Refrigerating Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Zimmerman Manufacturing Co. v. DolphMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Meredith v. Fay & Egan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Vinton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. Vermont Motor Co. v. MonkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  3. Howard v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  4. Record v. KempeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Record v. KempeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API