Legal Opinion

Record v. Kempe

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 2007No. 05-224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Defendants Mr. & Mrs. Kempe appeal a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Mr. & Mrs. Record on plaintiffs’ claim that defendants breached a contract for the sale of plaintiffs’ home. Plaintiffs asserted they were entitled to retain defendants’ deposit as authorized in the purchase and sale contract because defendants breached the contract. Defendants countered that they were entitled to return of the deposit because it was plaintiffs, in fact, who had breached the contract for sale. The jury found in favor of plaintiffs. We affirm.

¶ 2. In June 2001, defendants contracted to purchase…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Greene v. Stevens Gas ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Mobbs v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Cliche v. FairSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. McGee Construction Co. v. Neshobe Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pcolar v. Casella Waste Systems and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Matthew Ziniti v. New England Central Railroad, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  3. Record v. KempeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Downtown Barre Development v. GU Markets of Barre, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Berol Dewdney and Cordelia Dewdney v. Ralph E. Duncan, IVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API