Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maynard v. Reynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1904No. Docket No. 54Published

Error to Newaygo; Palmer, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by Romie Maynard against Wells S. Reynolds. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1DissentGrant, J.

Plaintiff brought an action of trespass guare clausum, fregit against the defendant, and in his declaration alleged that the defendant did cut down and carry away, without the leave of plaintiff, the owner thereof, two pine trees (alleging value) then and *46there being and standing as shade and ornamental trees •on the land of the plaintiff (describing it), and claiming three times the amount of damages sustained, under section 11204, 3 Comp. Laws. The summons was returnable July 26th. The justice of the peace returned to the circuit court that the parties appeared on that day; that the above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keyser v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Stretch v. Village of CassopolisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ostrom v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Orris v. KemptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API