Legal Opinion

Ostrom v. Potter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Trespass to lands. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This case originated in justice’s court, and was brought to recover damage for digging and carrying away three loads of dirt, worth 20 cents a load. The action is trespass, and the locus in quo was shown to be in a public highway, between the center thereof and the plaintiff’s inclosure. The declaration, omitting the formal parts, is as follows :

“The plaintiff, Henry W. Ostrom, in this cause complains of the defendants herein in a plea of trespass, for that the defendants, on, to wit, the 4th day of June, 1885, with force and arms the close of said plaintiff, situate in town of Avon,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. RiversNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Willoughby v. JenksNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Little v. . DennNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Whiting v. DudleyNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maynard v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Orris v. KemptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Horan v. BarbourMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Maloney v. WebberMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Maynard v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API