Legal Opinion

Georgas v. Kreindler & Kreindler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 10, 1999No. 97 CIV. 0511(CBM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action against her former employer, Kreindler & Kreindler, First Unum Life Insurance Co. (“First Unum”), and Provident Insurance Co. (“Provident”), alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent selection of an administrator for Kreindler & Kreindler’s group long term disability employee benefit plan (“EBP”). Plaintiff seeks payment of all benefits she claims are owed to her pursuant to the EBPs she participated in while in Kreindler & Krein-dler’s employ. Kreindler & Kreindler seeks to be dismissed from this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wojciechowski v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Engler v. Cendant Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  3. Bellah v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API