Legal Opinion

Huddleston v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 29, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShkiveb, J.

The parties will be referred to as complainant and defendants as they appeared in the Court below.

I

This suit was brought by the complainant to rescind a contract of purchase of a model 99 Taylor Automatic Freezer and to recover the purchase price.

In the original bill the complainant alleged that in 1952 he decided to enter into the business of selling ice milk products and desired to purchase the necessary machinery and equipment to produce same. He alleged that he was unfamiliar with the business he was about to enter and with the machinery used in such business.

Defendants were dealers in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hines v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Samuel v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Kohn v. BallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Vicon, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Cmi Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Sanders, Inc. v. Chesmotel Lodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API