Legal Opinion

In the Interest of JW v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2010No. S-09-0049PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] The district court entered its "Order on Permanency Hearing" on December 12, 2008. The process of handling the neglect complaint against the Mother (LW) in this case, which process eventuated in the order cited above, was managed by the Department of Family Services (DFS), the State of Wyoming acting through the District Attorney for the Seventh Judicial District, the Guardian ad Litem for the children affected (GAL), and a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) created under the child protection statutes and rules and regulations promulgated by DFS. An attorney was appointed to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Interest Of: Aa, a Minor Child, Ra v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  2. MMH v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. RB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Walters v. WaltersWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Jo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API