Jo v. State

BURKE, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, JO, challenges the juvenile court's order directing the Department of Family Services (DFS) to pursue a termination of Appellant's parental rights. She contends there was insufficient evidence to support a change in the permanency goal for her children. She also claims that DFS failed to provide a compelling reason for recommending termination of her parental rights. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Appellant raises the following issues:

1. Was the Department of Family Services required to provide a compelling reason for recommending a permanency plan of termination over…