MMH v. State

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellants, MMH and LJH, appeal from the juvenile court’s order denying their motion to intervene in custody proceedings relating to their granddaughter, EHD. Appellants claim the court abused its discretion in denying their motion. They further contend the court erred in denying their requests to be appointed to the multi-disciplin-ary team and to have EHD placed with them. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Appellants present the following issues:

1. Did the juvenile court abuse its discretion in denying Appellants’ request to intervene?

2. Did the juvenile court abuse its…